Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Fortran > Re: advance=no ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 46 Topic 8227 of 8656
 Post > Topic >>

Re: advance=no problem

by Steve Lionel <Steve.Lionel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 10:07 AM

On Tue, 13 May 2008 20:05:16 -0700 (PDT), robert.corbett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>When I use ifort 8.0 (the last version to which I have access),
>I get
>
>GHIDEF
>
>Do you agree that your reading of 95/000027 makes
>
>ABCDEFGHI
>
>the correct output?

ifort 10.1.021 gives the correct (ABCDEFGHI) output.

--
Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Cor****ation
Nashua, NH

For email address, replace "invalid" with "com"

User communities for Intel Software Development Products
  http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Sup****t
  http://sup****t.intel.com/sup****t/performancetools/fortran
My Fortran blog
  http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran




 46 Posts in Topic:
advance=no problem
 rudra <bnrj.rudra@[EMA  2008-05-12 06:22:39 
Re: advance=no problem
 rudra <bnrj.rudra@[EMA  2008-05-12 06:40:16 
Re: advance=no problem
 Gordon Sande <g.sande@  2008-05-12 13:50:13 
Re: advance=no problem
 harper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 11:47:46 
Re: advance=no problem
 tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 19:26:06 
Re: advance=no problem
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-12 11:43:13 
Re: advance=no problem
 tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 20:12:12 
Re: advance=no problem
 Janne Blomqvist <foo@[  2008-05-12 23:32:04 
Re: advance=no problem
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-12 13:09:41 
Re: advance=no problem
 Janne Blomqvist <foo@[  2008-05-13 00:48:07 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-12 20:32:24 
Re: advance=no problem
 Janne Blomqvist <foo@[  2008-05-12 23:55:24 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:31:12 
Re: advance=no problem
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-12 15:47:07 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 00:42:30 
Re: advance=no problem
 GaryScott <garylscott@  2008-05-13 07:21:14 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 08:57:42 
Re: advance=no problem
 GaryScott <garylscott@  2008-05-13 09:46:51 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 15:59:48 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-13 23:10:25 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 17:05:52 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-14 00:38:23 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-14 00:57:05 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 18:33:40 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-14 02:48:43 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 20:05:16 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 20:45:00 
Re: advance=no problem
 Steve Lionel <Steve.Li  2008-05-14 10:07:48 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 23:36:34 
Re: advance=no problem
 "Jugoslav Dujic"  2008-05-14 09:11:21 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 00:39:12 
Re: advance=no problem
 GaryScott <garylscott@  2008-05-14 07:18:32 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 07:47:59 
Re: advance=no problem
 Ron Shepard <ron-shepa  2008-05-14 10:11:23 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 12:12:11 
Re: advance=no problem
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-14 13:01:00 
Re: advance=no problem
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-14 11:09:33 
Re: advance=no problem
 GaryScott <garylscott@  2008-05-14 08:22:03 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-14 18:41:44 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 12:12:11 
Re: advance=no problem
 Gary Scott <garylscott  2008-05-14 20:59:30 
Re: advance=no problem
 "James Giles" &  2008-05-15 02:30:21 
Re: advance=no problem
 nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 20:44:10 
Re: advance=no problem
 robert.corbett@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 23:19:22 
Re: advance=no problem
 dongyuanxun <dongyuanx  2008-05-15 01:11:12 
Re: advance=no problem
 GaryScott <garylscott@  2008-05-15 07:00:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 8:24:51 CDT 2008.