by Ron Shepard <ron-shepard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 11, 2008 at 07:49 PM
In article <1igryih.bdvqtnzlk95yN%nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Richard Maine) wrote:
> Pointers can do more things, but if you don't need those other things,
> they are just a source of complication, confusion, and errors.
....and pointers cause some restrictions on optimizations that can be
done by compilers, whereas those optimizations are allowed with
allocatable arrays.
$.02 -Ron Shepard
