Re: MPI code error raises a question

Hello,

On 2008-05-08 16:15:17 -0400, Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
said:

> Dan Nagle wrote:

> Volatile has the same scoping issue as asychronous.
>> There was a long thread on the j3 list about this
>> since 183.
>> 
> Yes, it has the same scoping issue.  It just seemed like a
> better attribute to use.  I don't think of MPI as being
> an I/O thingo and volatile was designed, more or less,
> to allow for surprising changes to variables.

Yea, sure, ok, I agree.  :-)

OTOH, using MPI and being surprised sorta go together.  :-)

-- 
Cheers!

Dan Nagle