Re: weird g77 and gfortran

lindahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Greg Lindahl) writes:

> In article
<5065dea5-eb9e-4b0c-9413-04252b88eff0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> K-9  <rick.peng.du@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Good question. I'm trying to use g77 because i'm trying to develop
>>some fortran77-only code. Of course yes i can go with gfortran. I was
>>just curious to see the reason.
>
> Check out the f2c-abi. On x86 and x86-64, this is the difference between
> g77 and gfortran's calling conventions.

In that case, does this declaration fix the OP's code:

extern double r_ (int * d, float *b);

i.e., in the C code, declare the return value to be double, but
maintain the "real function r(m,t)" definition in the Fortran code
compiled by g77.

Chip

-- 
Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell
"Turn on, log in, tune out"
GPG Key ID: 852E052F
GPG Key Fingerprint: 77E5 2B51 4907 F08A 7E92  DE80 AFA9 9A8F 852E 052F