Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Fortran > Re: Are f.p. ma...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 26 of 42 Topic 8183 of 8908
Post > Topic >>

Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?

by "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 3, 2008 at 01:16 PM

"FX" <coudert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fvejtl$bb3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Testing with gfortran I found that RRSPACING, SCALE, SET_EXPONENT,
>>> and, SPACING were broken like this, while EXPONENT, FRACTION, and
>>> NEAREST seemed to work

> I isolated the failure, which turned out to be in the mingw-win64
> libraries, re****ted it to them and they fixed it.

Thanks.  The fix didn't make it into the 20080502 snapshot, though.
Maybe next week?  Are the problems with ERF, ERFC, ERFC_SCALED,
EXPONENT, FRACTION, GAMMA, and LOG_GAMMA for REAL(10) inputs on
Win64 also addressed by this fix, or are those a separate issue?
I would assume that the absence of BESSEL_J0, BESSEL_J1, BESSEL_Y0,
and BESSEL_Y1 for REAL(10) inputs for non-initialization expressions
for both Win32 and Win64 is a different issue altogether.

-- 
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-26 14:43:52 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
kargl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 21:52:30 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-26 16:24:59 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-26 20:55:30 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Charles Coldwell <cold  2008-04-27 13:00:43 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-27 13:53:14 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
lindahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-28 17:25:49 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
kargl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 22:54:20 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"Anony" <inv  2008-04-26 23:25:57 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-26 20:10:58 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"Anony" <inv  2008-04-27 12:34:46 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-04-27 18:37:33 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Tobias Burnus <burnus@  2008-04-27 01:25:20 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-27 03:32:59 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-04-27 18:39:17 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-30 11:17:01 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2008-04-30 22:18:33 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-04-30 22:54:21 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2008-05-01 00:14:51 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-05-01 08:06:56 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
lindahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 17:53:08 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-04-30 21:37:03 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2008-05-01 10:19:46 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2008-04-30 22:20:37 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-05-02 08:38:14 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-03 13:16:15 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-05-04 10:46:43 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-05 15:53:39 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-05 18:24:42 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Janne Blomqvist <foo@[  2008-05-06 11:05:35 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-06 04:01:57 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Janne Blomqvist <foo@[  2008-05-06 20:32:14 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-06 13:50:09 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-06 14:37:04 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-05-06 21:04:28 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-06 15:46:35 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Ron Ford <ron@[EMAIL P  2008-05-06 17:34:28 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"James Van Buskirk&q  2008-05-10 13:34:10 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
kargl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 20:30:26 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
"FX" <couder  2008-04-27 22:12:09 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
Charles Coldwell <cold  2008-04-28 10:46:00 
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
kargl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-01 05:05:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Nov 19 7:50:00 CST 2008.