Re: Avoided "set but never used" warnings for dummy variable reads

David Flower wrote:
> How about and INCLUDE file which puts nblocks_dum in a COMMON block
> (or MODULE) for test purposes.
> 
> The production version can have a modified INCLUDE file making the
> variables local.

If I understand your idea, a similar method was suggested earlier in
this thread but without the include test/production twist.  To me,
it feels too complex.

Currently, I'm leaning toward the "instructions at the point of need"-
style suggestion, viz,

   if (.false.) write(*,*) nblocks_dum ! to avoid 'set not used' warning

Regards,
--
Bil Kleb
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov