Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Fortran > Re: maine@summe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 8199 of 8656
Post > Topic >>

Re: maine@summertriangle.net

by "Ron Ford" <ron@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 1, 2008 at 10:27 PM

"Richard Maine" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1ig9ngk.i38suyw3bdr4N%nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I had once thought that unformatted files were in
>> terms of what now seems to be called
>> "numeric storage unit".   I was, then, surprised to
>> find them in terms of bytes.
>
> They were always in "processor-dependent units". The processor-dependent
> unit got a name (file storage unit) in f2003, along with a nonbinding
> recommendation, but no change of substance.
>
> The "processor-dependent units" were indeed processor dependent, as one
> might guess. If you ever thought otherwise, I'm afraid that can't be
> traced to any wording in the standard. I do realize that many people had
> such a confusion, but that doesn't have much to do with the standard,
> which gave not even a hint that the units in question would have
> anything to do with either numeric storage units or bytes.
>
> And I still don't see how this relates to the question about encoding,
> except insomuch as both are things people might be confused about, in
> which case they are both members of a large set.
>
> Maybe I'm just misunderstanding your citation style or something. It
> looks like you were answering my question about the relation****p between
> the recl and encoding maters, but then I don't see anything even
> mentioning a relation****p. All I see is commentary on recl.
>
> -- 
> Richard Maine                    | Good judgement comes from experience;
> email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
> domain: summertriangle           |  -- Mark Twain

This is an odd message from Richard, at least according to perl:
print join("\n", map ($_->[$subject_offset].' from '.$_->[$from_offset],

@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)),"\n";

yields
Re: maine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 from nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Richard Maine)

It sounds like Glen and Richard, but it's unusual to see Richard's e-mail
as 
the subject.  I suspect a mis-paste by Glen.

I don't know why my replies to Elliot look any different than replies to 
anyone else.  I thought it was a "replying to google thing."  I'll try
again 
with Dialog.

-- 
"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you
and you're going to burn in hell.  The other is that *** is the most
awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."

~~  Butch Hancock
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
maine@summertriangle.net
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-05-01 13:39:39 
Re: maine@summertriangle.net
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-01 14:53:19 
Re: maine@summertriangle.net
"Ron Ford" <  2008-05-01 22:27:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 8:17:46 CDT 2008.