Re: Derived Type Pointer Allocation Issue

On Apr 30, 5:38=A0pm, nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Richard Maine) wrote:

My apologies, that was my mistake. It should be pointer in the
original code, before we inherited responsibilityh for it.

> Michael <mwpowel...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > We're working with pointers here, not allocatables per se, defined in
> > a derived type, so I couldn't perform checks on allocated().
>
> You said that the problem was with the sg component, which your
> derived-type definition shows as allocatable, not pointer. That's
> exactly what my comment was based on.
>
> --
> Richard Maine =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| Good judgement
come=
s from experience;
> email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
> domain: summertriangle =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | =A0-- Mark Twain