FX wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Congratulation on this update. Might I ask, for the Win64 benchmark,
> whether you actually compiled code into 64-bit executables, or did use
> 32-bit executables (running under WoW64)?
>
No - we made 32 bit executables.
> Also, I'd like to suggest a modification: for "Full trace-back from
> run-time errors" (in the Linux "Compiler Diagnostic Capabilities"
table),
> I think gfortran should have a "yes", because it does sup****t output of
> backtraces with option -fbacktrace (see do***entation at
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gfortran/Debugging-Options.html).
>
I'll check it out. In general the requirement for a "Yes" here is that
the line number is specified for all routines in the call stack.
--
John Appleyard - (send email to john!news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rather than spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Polyhedron Software
Programs for Programmers - QA, Compilers, Graphics, Consultancy
********* Visit our Web site on http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/
*********
|
