Re: Can someone know the time for a oo implemented F2003 complier

Hi,

Richard Maine wrote:
> Well, from the tables of implmented features I have seen, it looks like
> IBM has been awful close for a while. I seem to recall that
> parameterized derived types were the only major feature listed as
> missing. I haven't had direct experience with the IBM compilers for
> quite a few years now (last one I tried was the beta of XLF for OS X),
> so I'm basing this just on the posted tables rather than on any kind of
> actual first-hand (or even second-hand) tests. And, of course, the
> operating system coverage is... limitted.

Do you know of any more or less up-to-date table describing the
implemented features of each compiler? For an application I'm
writting, I would very much like to use procedure pointers, but the
(little) search I've done in this group and in the PGI reference
manual didn't show up anything conclusive (there was an interesting
discussion about this a couple of years ago in this newsgroup, but I
wonder if things have chanced for the better since then).

Thanks,
=C1ngel de Vicente