Re: [SPOILER] Re: Euler problem #187

Marcel Hendrix wrote:
> anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) writes Re: [SPOILER] Re:
Euler problem #187
>
> > mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Marcel Hendrix) writes:
> > >anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) writes Re: [SPOILER]
Re: Euler problem #187
> [..]
> >>Your code, pasted into Gforth-fast, generates a number that is
rejected by
> >>the Euler solution checker?
>
> > If I run it on a 64-bit system, the result is correct.  If I run it on
> > a 32-bit system, or if I run it on iForth, it is too high by 1.  It's
> > not obvious where the bug is.
>
> You have strong evidence that the 64-bit system (and the algorithm)
> are perfect? I cannot read the code with these funny loops.

Let it be known throughout the land of Zeedibul
That Hendrix finds Forth quite unreadable.