Re: advantages of forth over other languages

Bruce McFarling wrote:
> I'm not sure where you got that the second statement is about pattern
> languages. Its the rationale that is said to be common between the
> two statements, not the subject matter.

I'm one of those crazy people who assumes that two sequential 
sentences-- especially one where the second references the first-- are 
related.

When people write and tell me that they didn't understand what I wrote, 
I usually take it that I didn't express myself well enough to be
understood.