Re: The Promise of Forth

anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) writes:

> Aleksej Saushev <asau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) writes:
>>> libltdl is no longer included in the
>>> dist.
>>
>>I have updated my tree, but libltdl directory stays there,
>>though some files did change. What does it do there?
>
> Nothing.
>
>>Is it intentional?
>
> Yes.  It's there in case we want to add libltdl back in.  CVS is not
> pleasant when you try to add directories that have the name of deleted
> stuff.

Why do you want to do that?

This is clear sign of bad design, Gforth has nothing to do with libltdl
installation. This is the job of packagers and system builders.

If you still want to ****p libltdl modified, why do you _include_ it in
Gforth?
Why not ****p it separatly?


-- 
BECHA...
   CKOPO CE3OH...