by Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/>
May 3, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Marcel Hendrix wrote:
>
>Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/>
wrote
Re: Did George Berkeley refute Issac Newton?
>[..]
>> Title: THE ANALYST; OR, A DISCOURSE Addressed to an Infidel
>> MATHEMATICIAN. WHEREIN It is examined whether the Object,
>> Principles, and Inferences of the modern Analysis are more
>> distinctly conceived, or more evidently deduced, than Religious
>> Mysteries and Points of Faith. By George Berkeley (1734)
>
>This certainly takes the concept "endless religious arguments
>over Forth" to unprecedented heights.
Hey if Good old George Berkeley and Issac Newton can have
religious arguments about calculus, why not follow that lead?
I am thinking of creating all my variable names along the
lines of 18th-cenury book titles. This should encouarage
me to use the stack instead.
<grin>
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.guymacon.com/>