by "Maki" <veselic123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 21, 2008 at 08:27 PM
<snip>
> [link][flags][code_ptr][count][name]
> because name is variable length
Good point.
<snip>
>>
>> 2. Implementation of word >name is trickier. It appears that >name now
>> should use FIND to go back to name field.
>
> It's not really find... I promise, you will enjoy coding.
Silly me. Ofcourse not FIND.
> And even a better one is the word that determines in which
> definition the address is. (Say, you want to print the return stack in
> case of errors).
> You will need an array of pointers to the last word in each chain of
> each word list.
> Relative links in name fields are probably worth doing it.
Code and headers aren't relocatable so I can use absolute links.
Thanks.
M.