Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: Type checki...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 71 Topic 3977 of 4053
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)

by Albert van der Horst <albert@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2008 at 09:27 PM

In article
<b6409894-74ed-4089-a21a-3451cd458581@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
m_l_g3  <m_l_g3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 8, 3:22 pm, Jonah Thomas <jethom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>> It looks like a lot of effort but so far I don't see any gotchas that
>> would keep it from working.
>
>I think, a bit less labor than for a Forth system from scratch,
>comparable to that for a Forth Assembler or a bit more. (Test suites
>and docs not counted).

An interesting comparison ... Is that a 6809 assembler (two evenings
worth) or a DEC Alpha assembler (10 long days of hard work)?

Groetjes Albert

--
-- 
Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
albert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst




 71 Posts in Topic:
The strengths of FORTH
 "Robert Miller"  2008-03-27 15:01:14 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Jonah Thomas <jethomas  2008-03-27 18:47:44 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-27 18:46:42 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-28 09:30:44 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-03-28 19:21:30 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-28 12:06:51 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 "Paul E. Bennett&quo  2008-03-27 23:21:10 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Brad Eckert <nospaambr  2008-03-27 19:03:48 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Jonah Thomas <jethomas  2008-03-27 22:15:25 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Benny Andersen <a.mail  2008-03-28 09:59:05 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 "dkelvey@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-28 07:50:09 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-28 09:25:07 
Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 20:33:46 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-28 09:42:22 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Reinhold Straub <demar  2008-03-29 04:48:43 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 William James <w_a_x_m  2008-03-29 12:00:12 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Reinhold Straub <demar  2008-03-30 05:59:03 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-02 01:04:50 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-07 09:46:32 
Re: Type checking
 "David N. Williams&q  2008-04-07 12:20:20 
Re: Type checking
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-07 17:30:08 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Trey Boudreau <trey@[E  2008-04-07 10:07:45 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-04-07 18:32:48 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Trey Boudreau <trey@[E  2008-04-07 16:46:00 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-08 08:01:23 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-04-08 10:16:55 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 kenney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-09 06:17:26 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-09 07:39:32 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Mark W. Humphries&q  2008-04-09 09:08:39 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-04-09 18:26:48 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-04-09 17:07:45 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Albert van der Horst <  2008-04-10 03:49:42 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-04-10 06:01:45 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Albert van der Horst <  2008-04-10 21:47:04 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-09 09:19:33 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 21:35:15 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3 <m_l_g3@[EMAIL   2008-04-17 17:27:21 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-08 14:14:30 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-08 07:18:34 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-09 08:49:44 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-08 07:29:56 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-09 07:37:06 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-10 08:04:57 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3 <m_l_g3@[EMAIL   2008-04-09 17:48:14 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-10 07:54:14 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Albert van der Horst <  2008-04-10 21:27:21 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-10 03:30:01 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3 <m_l_g3@[EMAIL   2008-04-10 04:16:59 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 "Stephan Becher"  2008-04-10 18:53:37 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3 <m_l_g3@[EMAIL   2008-04-10 04:48:57 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 m_l_g3 <m_l_g3@[EMAIL   2008-04-11 05:02:01 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-04-11 08:37:46 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Mikael Nordman <oh2aun  2008-03-28 19:41:15 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Albert van der Horst <  2008-03-28 22:26:26 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 "Robert Miller"  2008-03-29 00:19:04 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Mikael Nordman <oh2aun  2008-03-29 09:56:25 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-04-01 23:35:18 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Mikael Nordman <oh2aun  2008-04-02 18:39:30 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-04-06 18:48:28 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Brad Eckert <nospaambr  2008-04-04 09:29:12 
Re: The strengths of FORTH / OT: SMT soldering
 "Robert Miller"  2008-04-04 15:28:47 
Re: The strengths of FORTH / OT: SMT soldering
 John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-04-04 13:51:24 
Re: The strengths of FORTH / OT: SMT soldering
 Brad Eckert <nospaambr  2008-04-04 16:46:08 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 William James <w_a_x_m  2008-03-29 11:42:17 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 "Robert Miller"  2008-03-29 17:56:46 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Andrew Haley <andrew29  2008-03-30 10:03:42 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Albert van der Horst <  2008-03-30 15:10:11 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-30 09:54:09 
Re: The strengths of FORTH
 Jonah Thomas <jethomas  2008-03-30 09:59:30 
Re: The strengths of FORTH / OT: SMT soldering
 spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-05 13:49:18 
Re: Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
 Jonah Thomas <jethomas  2008-04-08 07:22:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 1:12:55 CDT 2008.