Jonah Thomas wrote:
> Don't believe anything just because I say so. For me this is a minor
> side issue. Arguing with you about it is useless to me. If I prove my
> point, you will drop this topic and pick on something else. If there's
> room to argue you'll go on arguing. Life's too short to spend it arguing
> about minor side issues with people who just want to pick at them.
For future discussion, how about you pre-identify which of your "facts"
are really just "minor side issues." You might use a XML-like notation.
Allow me to demonstrate:
<issue class=side>Object orientation has clearly failed.</issue>
See, that way when you decide to write a pretentious message filled with
unsup****ted opinions disguised as fact, we'll all know which you think
are unsup****table "minor side issues."
> Agree or disagree, I don't care. I'll try to focus on the parts that are
> central to me.
That's very weak. Here's a crazy idea: In the future when you want to
explore ideas, don't preface those ideas with unsup****table statements
that you later have to dismiss as "minor side issues." Just focus on
the ideas themselves.
|
