Re: Images and libraries

On Mar 29, 7:05 am, Doug Hoffman <no.spam> wrote:
> My interest is in increasing my knowledge about the different OOP models
> available for Forth.  I am also studying Bernd's OOF, Forth Inc.'s
> SWOOP, and Win32Forth's dialect of Neon.  This is a serious study, at
> least it is to me.  Did I ever intend to make a turnkey application with
> objects.fs?  That was going to depend on the outcome of my study.  At
> this point I would say no.

I am using Mini-OOF in Nicl, since my target is to span across from
smallish free-standing systems to the systems sitting in a modern
desktop OS.

So for me, OOF would probably be the most natural step up if anything
more than Mini-OOF is needed, e.g., for white box OOP (what I am
attempting now is all black-box, and Mini-OOF is sufficient).

Does it have this problem with savesystem? Obviously working
effectively with savesystem is im****tant for my context.