Re: The Promise of Forth

William James wrote:

> Richard Owlett wrote:
> 
>>John Doty wrote:
>>
>>>Elizabeth D Rather wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>John Doty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Elizabeth D Rather wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>> Yes, I've heard Michael Coughlin's tale about the project at
>>>>Smithsonian in the 70's where programmers "couldn't read their own
code".
>>>
>>>
>>>And you failed to take it seriously. Your response to anything contrary
>>>to your ideology is denial.
>>>
>>
>>Gee, Ms. Rather has not yet learned that only the great Doty is *RIGHT*
>>-- by definition (that is "his definition" and who is better to define
>>it, he is after all right (by definition ;)
> 
> 
> Mrs. Rather is a drone who never posts code that she
> has written.  Ever notice that?

So code only exists if posted on c.l.f ?
I happen to > 1 MB of source that she was responsible for on my machine.
OH, OK so I bought a licensed copy of SwiftForth.
Strange concept, some of us actually pay for value received.