Re: The Promise of Forth

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Marcel Hendrix wrote:

>
>
> Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes Re: The Promise of Forth
> [..]
> > So what'll it be? Are you guys going to continue along the sophist
path to
> > extinction if not utter irrelevance, or are you willing to at least
_try_
> > to get your shit together?
>
> You are pointing at us, while it is let's-do-it enthusiasts like you
that
> are organizing the conferences, setting up the chapter meetings, writing
the
> docs, committing the papers, and getting the libraries set up :-)

And your point is? That collectively the current bunch of Forth hackers
are doing an outstanding job mobilising the strengths of Forth and
actively promoting the usefullness of Forth in not only embedded system,
but as a general-purpose language as well? Is that your point? If it is,
how is it working for Forth so far? Is anybody listening yet?
-- 
Duke Normandin
dukeofperl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?