On Mar 24, 10:02 pm, jacko <jackokr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> weel how can it be that c the prefect of perfect could leave me be and
> yes it doesa drop me in to machine code lingo de longus, weel how can
> it be?
Pidgin Latin.
>
> could i not simplky refocus upon the backus nor form of I and develop
> untoward code, indewpendent of a evaluation stack of someones means,
> or my means. why doers the bsd ecxpext or retort the forth to be? how
> can it be that all does want for nothing but a standard libry?
No; Chaucer!
>
> give unto me te smallest partie that becumst the mostest that i seek,
> and come to seel for the consumerr.
Hang on, perhaps it's Shakespeare. But which play? Hmmm...
> or the participant. name space
> pollution is not a sufficent example to move to a pre pn of choice.
> give upon to me the compact gigabytes, and i shall showeth the code of
> indefinate evaluation but with provost of eternable definiteness ;-)
KJV Bible? Perhaps...
>
> well, get yer code in per la stack framus, per resolution a la la eval
> of tcl/tk. likus the stack decomposition vs. the blam poo of the error
> of pointer.
Got it. Gibberish.
>
> weel folks ya can't have ya biscuit and have ya cake.
>
> bootstrap is the bcpl of life ;-)
>
> cheers
> jacko
And English is a method of communication. For some of us.
--
Regards
Alex McDonald
|
