Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?

On Mar 24, 5:00 pm, an...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl)
wrote:
> Bruce McFarling <agil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >DOES> ( ... o -- ... ) @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 over @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 + @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 execute ;
>
> >... it would seem that when it does the ``OVER'', there's nothing
> >really on the stack, so its not surprising that it @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
's garbage.
>
> The stack effect notation above indicates the overall stack effect of
> words defined with METHOD; it does not reflect the stack effect of the
> code after the DOES>.  The difference is that, before executing the
> code the body address of the defined word is pushed on the stack.
>
> So, with more stack comments, you get:
>
> DOES> ( ... o -- ... ) ( o addr ) @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 over @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 + @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 execute ;
>
> and when the OVER executes, there are two items on the stack.

I'll put .1 .2 .3 in the DOES> and see which @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 gags the DOES>