Re: Creating and using arrays - again

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Krishna Myneni wrote:

>
>
> Duke Normandin wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Krishna Myneni wrote:
> > ...
>
> >> element. The only drawback is that if you use the FSL array notation
in your
> >> code, someone may read it and expect your arrays to be compatible
with FSL.
> >> That's not an excuse not to experiment for yourself; just that if you
stick to
> >> using this notation, eventually you might just consider doing:
> >>
> >> include fsl-util.fs
> >>
> >> 10 integer array ages{
> >>
> >> 15 ages{ 0 } !
> >> :
> >
> > You know, when I came up with that naming / indexing system, I didn't
> > realize how closely it resembled the FSL syntax. I hope that I haven't
> > mis-appropriated the syntax. If I have, I'll find some other way to do
it!
> > I will be re-reading your previous posts on the use of FSL.
>
> There's no problem with your using the same syntax for a different array
> implementation (in fact, there's a lot of compatibility with your
> implementation and the FSL, if you restrict its use to single integer
> types). If you use the same syntax, I'd suggest a comment at the top of
> your source files stating that the array implementation is different
> from the FSL.
>
> Krishna

Roger - Wilco / 10-4 and all that good stuff! ;)
-- 
Duke Normandin
dukeofperl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?