Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: part 21 ass...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 3895 of 4173
Post > Topic >>

Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp

by Bruce McFarling <agila61@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 15, 2008 at 06:03 PM

On Mar 15, 8:12 pm, John Doty <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> What we need is an accessible language, based on Forth's valuable core
> ideas, that can fill this gap.

But why shouldn't it be written in Forth, with Forth as its assembler?
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-15 18:03:55 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-15 19:22:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 22:27:41 CDT 2008.