Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: Open Firmwa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3879 of 4287
Post > Topic >>

Re: Open Firmware (was: part 21 asserts ...)

by Jonah Thomas <jethomas5@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 14, 2008 at 09:18 AM

anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) wrote:
> Jonah Thomas <jethomas5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> >One exception is OF, where MicroSoft had a Plug and Play advantage
> >and various competitors saw a chance to get leverage -- they could
> >have a cross-OS, cross-processor approach to get plug-ins that would
> >run on everything but PCs. But for one reason or another the
> >coalition broke down.
> 
> Did it?  Apple switched to EFI for their Intel-based machines, but did
> Sun, IBM, or Motorola abandon Open Firmware?

I read a long time ago that IBM was withdrawing, but I haven't verified
it. 
 
> I have read that Sun moved to EFI, but Wikipedia knows nothing about
> it, and Google tells me something about disk labels (partition tables)
> when I ask for "Sun EFI"; I guess that they use a PC BIOS or EFI for
> their Opteron-based boxes, though.

I read that Sun moved to EFI for their x86 production, meaning for most
of their new sales. I haven't seen anything about Motorola.

I would be pleased to find out OF isn't dying. A quick job search turned
up one San Jose company that wants OF experience along with expert C and
assembly and a lot of other qualifications.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Open Firmware (was: part 21 asserts ...)
Jonah Thomas <jethomas  2008-03-14 09:18:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 3:16:42 CDT 2008.