Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?

Bruce McFarling <agila61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>On Mar 12, 8:02 am, Josh Grams <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Bruce McFarling <agil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > On Mar 11, 5:11 pm, Josh Grams <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >> How did you get to that conclusion? <SNIP> I may be wrong, but
>> >> I don't think that a standard system should treat
>> >> FORTH-WORDLIST 1 SET-ORDER as an error.
>
>> > First, I ran it, and it was an error.
>> Can I ask what Forth this is?
>
>gforth 6.2

That would be a bug.  However, I cannot reproduce it.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2008:
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/euroforth/ef08.html