Re: Is this workable? .warning .error

On Mar 12, 6:43 pm, Albert van der Horst <alb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>  <m_l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >Maybe, something like
> >: myerror ?DUP IF . ABORT THEN ;
> >?

> : ?ERROR SWAP IF  ( optionally store information) THROW ELSE DROP THEN ;

(1) Obviously this is after the warning string has been show ... there
is nothing to swap.

(2) Not requiring THROW to be present but able to using THROW if it is
available and the configuration file asks for it, is the primary
design objective.

If THROW was assumed to always be present and always be desired, .Nicl-
err would be:

: .Nicl-err ( throw# ca u ) {.Nicl-warn} EXECUTE THROW ;