Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: part 21 ass...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3852 of 4173
Post > Topic >>

Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp

by Bruce McFarling <agila61@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 11, 2008 at 02:05 PM

On Mar 11, 4:44 pm, Duke Normandin <dukeofp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Again, we're back to one box, one Forth, and apps for that bundle. In
the
> desktop market a proprietary OS for a given set of hardware has not been
> as successful as the MSDOS/Windows Linux/BSD approach.

Yes, again we are back to the fact that the solution to one problem is
rarely the solution to all problems.

> Or is there no future in the desktop market?

That is subject to lots of speculation, but if there is, there's no
reason that Forth couldn't be part of it. However, it would not be
with a ForthOS type system.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-11 14:05:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 4:21:24 CDT 2008.