Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: part 21 ass...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 3851 of 4173
Post > Topic >>

Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp

by Bruce McFarling <agila61@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 11, 2008 at 10:53 AM

On Mar 11, 1:15 pm, John Doty <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> > Ian Osgood <i...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> >> A nice environment for Forth would be as a scripting language inside
> >> of gdb, especially when used to debug embedded systems over some kind
> >> of umbilical.

> > Oh, really.

> > Why not Scheme? Lua? Python?

> Because their fundamental abstractions are too far from the hardware.

However, for those who prefer Lua as a scripting language, it would be
nice to have a Lua written in Forth that could be loaded where Forth
was provided as a scripting language close to the hardware.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bruce McFarling <agila  2008-03-11 10:53:29 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Passaniti <nntp@[  2008-03-11 22:14:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 17:05:44 CDT 2008.