Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: part 21 ass...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 54 Topic 3806 of 4224
Post > Topic >>

Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?

by Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> Mar 10, 2008 at 08:52 PM

John Doty wrote:

>Guy Macon wrote:
>
>> John Doty wrote:
>
>>> Elizabeth D Rather wrote:
>>>
>>>> The effects you cite are not *necessarily* the result 
>>>> of the cause to which you attribute them.
>>
>>> Of course they are.
>> 
>> Evidence, please.
>
>I've given you the evidence. Repeatedly.

Cite, please.

You have never even tried to establish whether or not the 
effects you cite are the result of the cause to which you 
attribute them.  Feel free to prove me wrong with an exact 
quote or Message-ID where you believe that you did.

("It's obvious", "Most people would accept it", "It's like 
2+2=4" and "Of course they are" do not count as evidence.)

> if there's only one hypothesis on the table

John Doty, Meet Null Hypothesis.  Null Hypothesis, meet John Doty.

Now there are two on the table.
 




 54 Posts in Topic:
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
m-coughlin <m-coughlin  2008-03-07 10:38:11 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Elizabeth D Rather <er  2008-03-07 08:06:59 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Richard Owlett <rowlet  2008-03-07 12:50:19 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-07 12:14:26 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-08 01:30:31 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-07 18:53:16 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-08 02:41:56 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-08 16:03:35 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-09 16:12:17 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-09 10:51:39 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Elizabeth D Rather <er  2008-03-09 08:33:40 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-09 13:37:07 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 15:43:19 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 10:10:29 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-03-10 17:50:30 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Elizabeth D Rather <er  2008-03-10 08:13:12 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 13:04:55 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 20:24:04 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 14:36:11 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 20:52:30 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 15:06:33 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 22:25:21 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 16:56:41 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
"Stan Katz" <  2008-03-12 18:00:10 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-12 16:13:31 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Marc Olschok <nobody@[  2008-03-11 19:21:16 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-03-11 23:05:58 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-11 22:42:04 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 20:19:34 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-10 19:52:18 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 14:11:26 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-03-10 23:21:00 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Andrew Haley <andrew29  2008-03-10 21:24:12 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 16:02:05 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Andrew Haley <andrew29  2008-03-11 10:34:01 
A Brief Look at History (Re: part 21 asserts forth best for smal
m-coughlin <m-coughlin  2008-03-11 22:09:03 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Duke Normandin <dukeof  2008-03-11 15:04:25 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-03-11 16:40:14 
Writing Many New Versions of Forth (was Re: part 21 . . . )
m-coughlin <m-coughlin  2008-03-14 17:08:11 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Duke Normandin <dukeof  2008-03-11 17:14:42 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Elizabeth D Rather <er  2008-03-11 21:59:19 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-03-13 00:43:39 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-03-13 16:12:17 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Aleksej Saushev <asau@  2008-03-15 00:00:58 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Marc Olschok <nobody@[  2008-03-14 21:32:04 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Duke Normandin <dukeof  2008-03-11 20:44:40 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Elizabeth D Rather <er  2008-03-11 21:46:47 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Duke Normandin <dukeof  2008-03-10 05:19:15 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-07 11:56:33 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-08 00:16:03 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-03-07 17:34:02 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Albert van der Horst <  2008-03-08 10:58:33 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-08 17:11:27 
Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would l
kenney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-08 04:20:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 8:28:04 CDT 2008.