Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?

John Doty wrote:

>Without published code, the claims of shareable Forth code remain 
>unverifiable bragging.

....which leaves the reader with at least two options:

[1] Believe that I, Elizabeth, and everyone else who 
re****ts the results of first-hand practical experience 
with unpublished commercial code are all liars.

[2] Conclude that your chosen criteria are arbitrary and
that rejecting eyewitness testimony from multiple sources
is a poor method for determining what is and is not true.