Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: Particle Sw...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 37 Topic 3745 of 4325
Post > Topic >>

Re: Particle Swarm Optimization

by John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 13, 2008 at 02:35 PM

Marcel Hendrix wrote:
> John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes Re: Particle Swarm
Optimization
> [..]
>> Cool. I've done similar but rather less sophisticated things in 
>> Mathematica using a gnetlist back end I wrote to translate gEDA 
>> schematics into Mathematica equations. Take a look at:
> [..]
>> I don't suppose it would be hard to modify the code (Guile) to feed a 
>> different math package. My code is now part of the regular gEDA 
>> distribution, all GPL. It's nice to be able to draw the circuit rather 
>> than code the equations!
> 
> The netlist for a switched circuit does not tell the whole story.
> In principle, an hierarchically structured netlist for each valid 
> combination of the switches (including diodes) is needed. From these
> netlists state-space matrices are build. Together with some Petri-net
> massaged constraint equations, finally the network can be solved
> with exponential matrix manipulations. Unfortunately, the constraints 
> are numerical, not symbolical. One of my famous Forth toys can do all
> of this (from an annotated netlist), but I didn't use it (yet) in this 
> instance.

Ok, now the next question is "would it be useful to other people?". A 
gnetlist back end is typically an afternoon project, so given the specs, 
I'd be willing to code it. I'd get to add another unique capability to 
gEDA (strengthening its "market position"), while if you were willing to 
release your code under GPL, you'd get to promote one of your "famous 
Forth toys" to a community that might actually use it.

> 
> A normal linear circuit is a special case of a switched circuit, so I
> can handle it too. The graphic output is currently done through
> Matlab, but I guess gnuplot will be used in the future (when I have
> time, and when gnuplot handles TeX labeling).
> 
> -marcel
> 


-- 
John Doty, Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
--
History teaches that logical consistency is neither sufficient nor 
necessary to establish practical, real world truth. Those who attempt to 
use logic for that purpose are abusing it.
 




 37 Posts in Topic:
Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-02 12:19:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
"Paul E. Bennett&quo  2008-02-03 21:30:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Alex McDonald <blog@[E  2008-02-06 00:57:28 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:49:46 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
m-coughlin <m-coughlin  2008-02-23 22:31:01 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
William James <w_a_x_m  2008-02-06 02:23:23 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-06 21:33:55 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:50:32 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:51:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-10 17:29:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-10 22:41:01 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Albert van der Horst <  2008-02-11 10:52:36 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-11 19:19:35 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Albert van der Horst <  2008-02-12 11:39:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-12 11:00:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-13 07:38:53 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-13 10:35:49 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-13 19:59:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-13 14:35:17 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-16 12:21:38 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-16 12:39:34 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-18 10:40:50 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-18 20:21:40 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-18 15:29:13 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Jerry Avins <jya@[EMAI  2008-02-18 17:39:54 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-19 20:20:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:14:52 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-19 12:36:16 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:59:36 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-11 12:55:24 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-11 19:42:17 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:55:44 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:54:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-02-17 09:08:04 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-17 17:14:44 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-02-17 15:29:03 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:39:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 14:47:48 CST 2008.