Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: Particle Sw...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 37 Topic 3745 of 4325
Post > Topic >>

Re: Particle Swarm Optimization

by Albert van der Horst <albert@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 11, 2008 at 10:52 AM

In article <22823313213559@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Marcel Hendrix <mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Anton Ertl) writes Re: Particle Swarm
Optimization
>> mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Marcel Hendrix) writes:
>>> Triggered by a (German) C't article, last week I experimented a bit
>>> with Particle Swarm Optimization.
>> ...
>>> Unfortunately, I found the results quite unconvincing.
>[..]
>> Yes.  Maybe I missed something, but the particle swarm stuff seems to
>> be similar to ant algorithms to me; and that fails to convince me, too
>> (but maybe I miss the point of that, too): We know the best path yet
>> after the first ant walks it, no need to simulate multiple ants
>> walking the same path.  Such algorithms may have a place if you have
>> massive parallelism, and very limited communication bandwidth compared
>> to computation, but not in settings that most of us use.
>
>Well, ant algorithms can solve 'discrete' problems (without
>derivatives) which is useful. AFAIK, particle swarms can't
>handle such discrete problems, and are very bad at accurately
>finding derivatives. Apparently the algorithm is so deeply
>buried in C++ that even C't editors can't find it. Or maybe
>they were only looking at the graphics :-)

Was your ampliphier a discrete problem?

I got interested in simulated annealing for planning problems.
My previous assignment involved a steel milling plant, with many
restrictions on what products can follow what other products, and
complicated rules about using resources and weighting unrelated
aspects.

Given there are about thousand products a week, so the search space
was 1000! to start with, and given that computer assisted planning
already was very near optimal, I gave the customer little hope that a
s.a. solution could better this, so the project was cancelled.
But this left me wondering how far s.a. could have got with this
problem. Evaluating a planning involves running a simulated
factory over it, which is much more costly than a step evaluation
in a typical travelling salesman problem.

>
>-marcel
>

Groetjes Albert

--
-- 
Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
albert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
 




 37 Posts in Topic:
Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-02 12:19:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
"Paul E. Bennett&quo  2008-02-03 21:30:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Alex McDonald <blog@[E  2008-02-06 00:57:28 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:49:46 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
m-coughlin <m-coughlin  2008-02-23 22:31:01 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
William James <w_a_x_m  2008-02-06 02:23:23 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-06 21:33:55 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:50:32 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:51:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-10 17:29:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-10 22:41:01 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Albert van der Horst <  2008-02-11 10:52:36 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-11 19:19:35 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Albert van der Horst <  2008-02-12 11:39:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-12 11:00:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-13 07:38:53 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-13 10:35:49 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-13 19:59:37 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-13 14:35:17 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-16 12:21:38 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-16 12:39:34 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-18 10:40:50 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-18 20:21:40 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-18 15:29:13 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Jerry Avins <jya@[EMAI  2008-02-18 17:39:54 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-19 20:20:06 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:14:52 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL   2008-02-19 12:36:16 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:59:36 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-11 12:55:24 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-11 19:42:17 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:55:44 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:54:00 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-02-17 09:08:04 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-17 17:14:44 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
Doug Hoffman <no.spam&  2008-02-17 15:29:03 
Re: Particle Swarm Optimization
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-19 10:39:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 14:12:16 CST 2008.