

|
 |
| Programming > Forth > Re: common plac... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 7 of 19 Topic 3756 of 4325
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: common place apps in forth available, for example irc, or multi
by Richard Owlett <rowlett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 10, 2008 at 07:31 AM
| pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> John Doty wrote:
>
>>pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>John Doty wrote:
>>>
>>>>gavino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I have seen that forth can do the things c can. Are there common
apps
>>>>>for linux such as a IRC chat client, a web browser, a multi chatter
>>>>>like pidgin? x-terminal? things like that?
>>>>
>>>> From its very beginning, Forth has never had much success at "me too"
>>>>programming. Its successes have mainly been in places where other
>>>>techniques have either failed or not even been tried.
>>>
>>>That's not entirely correct. There was a Lotus 123 clone with added
>>>functionality that was written in kforth (not the kforth you sometimes
>>>see posted about these days). I think it was called VP-plus, and it
>>>was "better" as a product but defeated by legal efforts based on look
>>>and feel. It's just that you didn't hear much about the Forth side of
>>>clone efforts like that. It mwould certainly be interesting to see its
>>>source...
>>
>>So we don't actually know whether that software could have been
>>successful. But in the end, it wasn't. That's the best you can come up
>>with? I rest my case.
>
>
> Then you've effectively surrendered the point. We DO know whether that
> software could have been successful - it was (I've actually used it
> myself). It was precisely because it was a superior product that the
> lawyers were brought in. "But in the end, it wasn't" is wrong - in the
> end, it was litigated out of the market. P.M.Lawrence.
Messing him up with FACTS. unfair ;)


|
19 Posts in Topic:
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-08 10:34:21 |
|
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL |
2008-02-08 11:50:18 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-08 13:27:51 |
|
pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-02-09 22:15:18 |
|
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL |
2008-02-10 03:38:43 |
|
pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-02-10 04:23:38 |
|
Richard Owlett <rowlet |
2008-02-10 07:31:06 |
|
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL |
2008-02-11 13:03:47 |
|
John Doty <jpd@[EMAIL |
2008-02-10 08:01:58 |
|
"Mark W. Humphries&q |
2008-02-10 06:25:19 |
|
pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-02-10 21:45:51 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-11 11:31:32 |
|
Coos Haak <chforth@[EM |
2008-02-11 21:22:41 |
|
MatthewK <Matthewk@[EM |
2008-02-12 12:00:08 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-11 11:32:36 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-11 11:33:30 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-11 12:21:36 |
|
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA |
2008-02-11 12:23:28 |
|
pml540114@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-02-11 23:49:04 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|