Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: I found a F...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 53 Topic 3681 of 4325
Post > Topic >>

Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better

by winston19842005 <bjjlyates@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 6, 2008 at 10:13 AM

On 1/6/08 9:24 AM, in article
these3rt0only-3DB255.15242806012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Roelf Toxopeus"
<these3rt0only@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article <flqcpa$88f$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> 
>> All those seem to reorder the stack in FORTH, I'm interested in
something
>> which rewrites FORTH words in terms of other FORTH words, especially
words
>> which operate on the stack.  I've basically exhausted what their
program can
>> do, but when I realized that it had a problem with generating sequences
>> using low valued PICK and ROLL's, I was hoping for something better.
>> 
>> 
>> Rod Pemberton
> 
> In MacForth we have something called Optimizer Reductions.
> Patterns of words are reduced to single pieces of code.
> 
> : tt swap drop ;    will be compiled as    : tt nip ;
> 
> You can add new patterns and their reduction with
> add-pattern ( xt1 .. xtn n replacemntxt -- )
> 
> ' swap ' + 2 ' haha add-pattern

I looked at the page for MacForth.
I was surprised that you cannot download a demo without sending an email
with your "details" including your background with Forth!

Seems a little too invasive for me!
 




 53 Posts in Topic:
I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better version.
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 00:26:01 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 09:22:17 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 04:37:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 11:00:53 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:10:48 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:24:17 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 12:58:34 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:27:20 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Coos Haak <chforth@[EM  2008-01-06 21:16:07 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Ed" <nospam  2008-01-07 17:51:08 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-07 17:22:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:00:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
none <""jan\  2008-01-06 14:07:31 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 15:27:04 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:32:53 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:05:30 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-06 13:42:55 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:09:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-06 13:46:06 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 18:25:08 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-07 10:58:44 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-07 21:39:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-07 22:57:58 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-08 08:13:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-08 05:07:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-08 18:26:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Alex McDonald <blog@[E  2008-01-08 03:04:52 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Roelf Toxopeus <these3  2008-01-06 15:24:29 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better
winston19842005 <bjjly  2008-01-06 10:13:11 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:01:26 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:52:02 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:54:01 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-01-06 18:34:43 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
helmwo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-06 10:27:48 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:26:05 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-01-06 23:02:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
kenney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-07 09:47:13 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:43:00 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Jenny Brien <jennybrie  2008-01-08 14:06:38 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bill <bill@[EMAIL PROT  2008-01-08 21:20:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-09 04:57:34 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Jenny Brien <jennybrie  2008-01-10 09:50:29 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-11 03:34:02 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Jenny Brien" &  2008-01-11 17:49:07 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-12 04:31:21 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
astrobe <fdubois76@[EM  2008-01-14 09:31:33 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-19 10:11:10 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-20 15:33:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
ygrek <ygrek@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 12:31:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 17:58:45 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-06 18:22:00 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 18:18:56 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
ygrek <ygrek@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-07 09:05:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 14:07:39 CST 2008.