Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: I found a F...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 53 Topic 3681 of 4325
Post > Topic >>

Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better version.

by "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 6, 2008 at 06:09 AM

"Marcel Hendrix" <mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:38331417223559@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There is Fifth STACK

From an old post of yours, it's supposedly on taygeta, but it FIFTH was a
commercial FORTH...  No, there seem to be many FORTH's named FIFTH. 
Another
old post of yours indicates it is by Click.  And, a recent post by Steve
Graham has a link to it and a linke to an ED article on tuwien:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.forth/msg/5f24ad2cd06e6e14?hl=en

And, it's in bld.fiv in FIFTH.ZIP from an ancient no longer mirrored
Simtel
directory which has some other archived FORTH's from '84 to '93:
http://files.chatnfiles.com/Simtel/DISC2/FORTH/

And, I've got no idea what he's doing in STACK in bld.fiv...

There is also this post of FIFTH's STACK word in x86(?):
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.forth/msg/d917a7dc989b8c1c?hl=en

Anyway, the second one has far to much for a tight, compact mapping onto
x86...

I thought taygeta stopped archiving stuff around '98...  Hmm, I guess not:
http://www.taygeta.com/forth.html

> and this one: http://www.paul.de/downloadables/index.htm
.

reorder.seq or reorder.f

....reorders stack elements...

> The search engine at Quartus net is pertty good for this:
http://www.quartus.net/search/


All those seem to reorder the stack in FORTH, I'm interested in something
which rewrites FORTH words in terms of other FORTH words, especially words
which operate on the stack.  I've basically exhausted what their program
can
do, but when I realized that it had a problem with generating sequences
using low valued PICK and ROLL's, I was hoping for something better.


Rod Pemberton
 




 53 Posts in Topic:
I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better version.
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 00:26:01 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 09:22:17 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 04:37:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 11:00:53 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:10:48 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:24:17 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 12:58:34 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:27:20 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Coos Haak <chforth@[EM  2008-01-06 21:16:07 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Ed" <nospam  2008-01-07 17:51:08 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-07 17:22:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:00:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
none <""jan\  2008-01-06 14:07:31 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
mhx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-01-06 15:27:04 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:32:53 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:05:30 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-06 13:42:55 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 06:09:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-06 13:46:06 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 18:25:08 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-07 10:58:44 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-07 21:39:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-07 22:57:58 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-08 08:13:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-08 05:07:03 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Albert van der Horst <  2008-01-08 18:26:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Alex McDonald <blog@[E  2008-01-08 03:04:52 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Roelf Toxopeus <these3  2008-01-06 15:24:29 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better
winston19842005 <bjjly  2008-01-06 10:13:11 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:01:26 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:52:02 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 08:54:01 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-01-06 18:34:43 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
helmwo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-06 10:27:48 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:26:05 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bernd Paysan <bernd.pa  2008-01-06 23:02:25 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
kenney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-07 09:47:13 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 13:43:00 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Jenny Brien <jennybrie  2008-01-08 14:06:38 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Bill <bill@[EMAIL PROT  2008-01-08 21:20:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-09 04:57:34 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
Jenny Brien <jennybrie  2008-01-10 09:50:29 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-11 03:34:02 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Jenny Brien" &  2008-01-11 17:49:07 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-12 04:31:21 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
astrobe <fdubois76@[EM  2008-01-14 09:31:33 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
foxchip <fox@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-19 10:11:10 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
stephenXXX@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-20 15:33:32 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
ygrek <ygrek@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-06 12:31:47 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 17:58:45 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
anton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-06 18:22:00 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-01-06 18:18:56 
Re: I found a FORTH stack optimzer, but could use a better versi
ygrek <ygrek@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-07 09:05:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 14:00:58 CST 2008.