Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Forth > Re: need an uno...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 3561 of 4325
Post > Topic >>

Re: need an unoptimized Forth :)

by helmwo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 3, 2007 at 01:01 PM

How about RetroForth?

-Helmar

m_l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> For educational purposes, I need a Forth for i386 coded
> straightforwardly, preferrably for Linux.
>
> That is,
> see dup
> must show
> code dup
>   pop eax
>   push eax
>   push eax
>   next,
> end-code
>
> and see @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 should show something like
> code @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   pop eax
>   push [eax]
> next, end-code
>
> Ability to use variable names as operands is a plus, e.g.
> variable MYVAR
> code xyz
>   mov eax, [] MYVAR
>   push eax
> ...
>
> The closest match is F-PC, but it's 16-bit.
>
> (Forth is the best user-friendly interface for Assembler)
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
need an unoptimized Forth :)
m_l_g3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-10-03 05:55:39 
Re: need an unoptimized Forth :)
helmwo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-10-03 13:01:58 
Re: need an unoptimized Forth :)
benhoyt <benhoyt@[EMAI  2007-10-16 10:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 13:34:51 CST 2008.