Re: Naming of Standard words

ward mcfarland wrote:
> Thus I would prefer
> RECORD: .... ;RECORD
> to
> RECORD  .... END-RECORD (or was it ENDRECORD, END_RECORD, RECORD-END)
>
> and
>
> CODE: ... ;CODE
> to
> CODE ... END-CODE

In Factor, the ; word goes through a layer of indirection, so we have:

: ... ;  colon definitions
M: .... ; methods
C: .... ; constructors

etc. I find this is more readable than ;M ;C and so on.

Slava