Albert van der Horst <albert@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: >I'm so strongly in favor of throwable io-codes that I sacrificed >ISO-compatibility in this respect in ciforth. I don't see a conflict between throwable IORs and a system's standard compliance. What did you do, and why? Fup2 clf. - anton -- M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html EuroForth 2006: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/euroforth2006/
