Re: Mike and Ward, what next?

ward mcfarland wrote:
> ... maybe we should go back to a tokenized model with the token
> displatching engine written as a Universal Binary and just abandon
> including an assembler or attempting to do non-trivial optimizing...
>
> My comment for the day is "ugh"
>
>  -- w

What would happen if you used AS, the assembler that's included with
the OS?  If my understanding is correct, AS is the optimized version of
GAS, the GNU Assembler.  I believe GAS tries to keep instructions
consistent across architectures, so you would have some measure of
****tability and optimization at the same time.  It's just a guess,
though.  I'm not that well-versed with assembly.

Erik