Re: eiffel parser in SmartEiffel

llothar a écrit :
> On 21 Jul., 10:29, lee <cogn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> If speed
>> and ****tability are the two most im****tant criteria, it sounds like
>> you would
>> still choose SmartEiffel over EiffelStudio.  In your previous
> 
> Hmm, i would use C, D or C++ (better used as a C with cl*****).

What about Ada? It is unique as Eiffel is. Mostly oriented to safety and
correctness. Ada has a very strong open source compiler GNAT integrated
with GCC.

I've been a big fan of Eiffel and Ada. But the lack of good compiler for
Eiffel is not promising... At the moment I really enjoy working with Ada
which is lot better than C, D or C++... especially for someone coming
from Eiffel and aiming at software engineering instead of coding!

Just my 2 cents :)

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.net
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595