Re: eiffel parser in SmartEiffel

On Jul 20, 1:56 pm, llothar <llot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 20 Jul., 22:54, lee <cogn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > ECMA/non-ECMA Eiffel world.  It would be great for anyone who has used
> > both major compilers (i.e., SmartEiffel and EiffelStudio) to comment
> > about my concerns regarding speed and ****tability.  Thanks.
>
> Well as the worlds most heavy Smalleiffel/Smarteiffel user (i'm 0.74b
> which is just in the middle) i can comment on one of this.
>
> The speed of the SmartEiffel compiled programs is indeed excellent.
>
llothar,

So, if you had to choose between the two, which one would you choose?
If speed
and ****tability are the two most im****tant criteria, it sounds like
you would
still choose SmartEiffel over EiffelStudio.  In your previous
response, you
mentioned that SmallEiffel was too low level.  Did you mean
SmallEiffel instead of
SmartEiffel?

Lee