[Non language newsgroups removed.]
On Jan 27, 11:07 am, Xah Lee <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> (just noticed that you also posted to comp.lang.dylan. Dylan is a very
> advanced, industrial, and also dead language.
There are very few users, and you can call it dead if you like, but
we are still improving it.
There's been a lot of work done recently, such as getting much of
DUIM working with the GTK back-end, getting the C back-end working
again for Open Dylan (nee Functional Developer, nee Harlequin Dylan)
thus improving its ****tability, improvements to the standard
libraries,
Network Night Vision (http://www.networknightvision.com),
etc.
> It is not a language for
> kids. Even a professional programer would have hard time learning
> Dylan.)
Certainly no more so than Common Lisp. On par with Java, I would
guess,
and probably much easier than C++. But you were probably just
trolling.
-cg
|
