Re: Understanding Error Messages

You have NEVER posted a copy of source code WITH MATCHING error messages -
where 
the compiler rejects code in columns 8 and 12.

You say,

 " Therefore, it did not worked and there were not any Error message show 
me."

what makes you think that it didn't work if there were no error messages. 
Are 
you still compiling with FLAG(I,I)?

You CLAIM,

"> What you see in the right source code,
  Areas is according to:
   11->Indicator
   12->Area-A
   16->Area-B
"

Again, you have NOT shown us the exact source code and a listing to match
it. 
I'll bet that if you seriously look at the mainframe listing you will see
that 
those are NOT the columns used for a successful compile.  If you just
posted the 
****tion of the successful compiler listing that starts with the "header"
line 
showing columns of the source code, I can almost guarantee that what you
are 
claiming is NOT what you are actually compiling.

-- 
Bill Klein
 wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"amir" <ahsharif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:aa482c62-3b53-4905-aaa6-6b5d79a1a3e1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear Friends,
> I did it according to References I have.
> According to these references, I have to start at column 7 for
> Indicator and 8 for Area-A and 12 for Area-B.
> I did it according to my references.
>
> Therefore, it did not worked and there were not any Error message show
> me.
> I showed you one of my exact error messages.
>
> What you see in the right source code,
> Areas is according to:
> 11->Indicator
> 12->Area-A
> 16->Area-B
> If you subtract 3 from each number, you get the standard numbers.
> ISPF-Editor showed these numbers, may some bad setting in the editor
> and viewer configuration or an Standard in ISPF-Editor, I did not know
> about it.
> Best,
>