Re: Java Batch

In article <68f55lF2rpuveU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Pete Dashwood <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
><docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fvsi79$iae$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Mr Dashwood, consider the following:
>>
>> Given that a cor****ation has finite resources then how are user changes
>> (which consume resources) to be co-ordinated and allocated in a manner
>> which is not reflective of 'the squeakiest wheel' and which is most
>> profitable to the organisation?
>
>It's easy. Change the way you develop stuff. Take a look at Active 
>methodology. (Both IBM and MicroSoft have recently...)

Mr Dashwood, I've taken a look at Active methodology and have found 
nothing which addresses this question above.  Second request, then... 
given that a cor****ation has finite resources how are user changes (which 
consume resources) to be co-ordinated and allocated in a manner which is 
not reflective of 'the squeakiest wheel' and which is most profitable to 
the organisation?

DD