Re: Java Batch

In article <68duetF2ritg7U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Pete Dashwood <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>"chuck" <charles.leviton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:b771707f-7b70-4d26-a01d-ccd21d0e6ef5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On May 5, 11:22 pm, Robert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT), Pakku <pa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>> wrote:
><snip>
>>
>> But attempts at conversions get bogged down with changed business
>> specifications.  As soon as system users hear there is going to be a
>> conversion they want all these new requirements to be incor****ated-
>> kind of like "While you are  in there making this change, why not make
>> this additional teensy change as well" that most programmers know
>> about!
>
>Yeah, users are the pits... Always wanting something, never satisified.

Mr Dashwood, consider the following:

Given that a cor****ation has finite resources then how are user changes 
(which consume resources) to be co-ordinated and allocated in a manner 
which is not reflective of 'the squeakiest wheel' and which is most 
profitable to the organisation?

Never mind that 'I know it's what I told you but it's not what I want 
TODAY' is demoralising for everyone involved... it Costs Money.

DD