Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Java Batch
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 25 of 52 Topic 4098 of 4167
Post > Topic >>

Re: Java Batch

by "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 02:59 AM

"chuck" <charles.leviton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:b771707f-7b70-4d26-a01d-ccd21d0e6ef5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 5, 11:22 pm, Robert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT), Pakku <pa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> wrote:
<snip>
>
> But attempts at conversions get bogged down with changed business
> specifications.  As soon as system users hear there is going to be a
> conversion they want all these new requirements to be incorporated-
> kind of like "While you are  in there making this change, why not make
> this additional teensy change as well" that most programmers know
> about!

Yeah, users are the pits... Always wanting something, never satisified.

They despise techies and don't even try to understand the basics.

They just don't seem to get it. Computer systems are there for us to
improve 
our skills. So we can go down the road and get even more money for not 
providing service.

And what's with this "It's great, but can we just have this one small 
change...?"   We sweat blood to give them what they told us they wanted
when 
we did the requirements gathering, and then when we deliver it, they want
it 
changed.

Like we should be responsive to them changing their minds. As if we had 
nothing better to do than be at their beck and call all day.

It's time they figured out who the dog is and who the tail is around here.

We can bring them to a standstill any time we want.

They don't understand the awesome responsibility we have to carry every
day. 
And all we ask is for them to be clear in what they want and be glad when
we 
deliver it, even if it is no longer relevant. Not our fault if the
business 
changes and the markets change and the technology changes and what they 
needed before isn't what they need now... THEY signed off the functional 
spec. ('Course, we wouldn't have started work if they hadn't...)

Nah, don't talk to me about users.

Bloody wimpy little cry-babies who're never satisfied...

Pathetic.

Pete.
-
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."




 52 Posts in Topic:
Java Batch
Pakku <pakku@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 10:32:17 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 17:40:53 
Re: Java Batch
Pakku <pakku@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 11:33:24 
Re: Java Batch
"HeyBub" <he  2008-05-02 14:22:11 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 22:28:28 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 11:48:33 
Re: Java Batch
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-05 07:57:22 
Re: Java Batch
Joe Zitzelberger <zber  2008-05-20 23:31:10 
Re: Java Batch
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 12:20:18 
Re: Java Batch
Thomas Zierer <Thomas.  2008-05-02 22:01:10 
Re: Java Batch
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-05-05 16:12:52 
Re: Java Batch
Pakku <pakku@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-05 10:30:13 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-05 18:30:34 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 22:22:00 
Re: Java Batch
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-06 08:01:33 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 12:06:02 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-06 17:56:17 
Re: Java Batch
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-06 12:38:35 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 19:00:45 
Re: Java Batch
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-05-07 17:29:14 
Re: Java Batch
Pakku <pakku@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-05 10:31:41 
Re: Java Batch
Arnold Trembley <arnol  2008-05-06 05:31:53 
Re: Java Batch
chuck <charles.leviton  2008-05-07 05:54:33 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 13:23:55 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-08 02:59:42 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 15:35:05 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-08 14:00:21 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 07:14:46 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-09 02:36:21 
Re: Java Batch
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-05-08 21:00:03 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 19:14:16 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 18:55:00 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-10 00:34:34 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 22:03:49 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-10 16:43:06 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-10 22:48:31 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 03:31:43 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 01:31:17 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 17:59:09 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-13 21:07:21 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 15:19:22 
Re: Java Batch
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 19:10:39 
Re: Java Batch
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-05-07 17:34:04 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-08 14:36:12 
Re: Java Batch
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-08 07:05:13 
Re: Java Batch
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-05-08 08:30:02 
Re: Java Batch
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-08 08:42:48 
Re: Java Batch
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-05-08 10:30:57 
Re: Java Batch
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2008-05-08 12:52:44 
Re: Java Batch
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-09 11:28:56 
Re: Java Batch
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 21:31:19 
Re: Java Batch
Joe Zitzelberger <zber  2008-05-20 23:24:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 4 21:00:10 CDT 2008.