Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: COBOL Compi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 78 of 101 Topic 4093 of 4167
Post > Topic >>

Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows

by Richard <riplin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 2, 2008 at 12:42 PM

On May 2, 4:58=A0pm, Binyamin Dissen <postin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Thu, 01 May 2008 21:24:38 -0500 Robert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> :>On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:39:46 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> :>wrote:
>
> :>>Point 2 is largely an illusion. Certainly, there are no viruses on
> :>>mainframes, but there will be once they are opened up to the network;
i=
t is
> :>>only a matter of time. (No, I don't have mainframe virus writing on
my
> :>>"TODO" list, but it would be an "interesting" exercise... :-)).
>
> :>How does a virus get into a database server? You can't send it
executabl=
e code.
>
> Buffer overflow.

In order for a 'Buffer Overflow' to work then first there needs to be
a buffer that can overflow, that is a data block that is larger than
the buffer must be able to get to it unchecked. If the gateway or I/O
system checks the data block size then buffer overflow won't happen.

Next it needs to overflow from a data area into an area that can be
executed. If the memory is segmented so that data segments cannot be
executed then the buffer overflow may corrupt data but it won't
execute code.

Then if it can get executed it needs to be able to establish itelf in
the system, by for example adding some code to an executable on the
disk so that it can be run each time that program is started. If the
file system priviledge prevents this then it will only be a data
corruption in a single program run.

So why are the vast majority of viruses aimed at Windows ? It is
because MS makes it easy and other systems make it hard.




 101 Posts in Topic:
COBOL Compiler for Windows
amir <ahsharif@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 03:31:42 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-04-28 10:50:35 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-29 00:11:55 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-29 07:32:12 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-29 10:13:48 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-29 08:43:41 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 02:02:54 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-30 10:42:30 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Michael Mattias&quo  2008-04-30 12:59:35 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 10:11:10 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-04-29 10:38:57 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 02:56:51 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-30 10:58:52 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 10:39:46 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2008-05-01 11:54:55 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 21:45:41 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 11:43:16 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 07:51:07 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 14:58:27 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 09:19:43 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 16:00:36 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 11:55:22 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 01:07:04 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 21:16:45 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 21:59:07 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"tlmfru" <la  2008-05-02 10:18:25 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 04:53:47 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 17:37:44 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 11:20:49 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 07:45:31 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-02 13:11:37 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 12:41:52 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"James J. Gavan"  2008-05-02 03:53:21 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 22:44:26 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 14:43:27 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 04:59:29 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-02 08:52:50 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"James J. Gavan"  2008-05-02 19:04:30 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-02 13:21:54 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"James J. Gavan"  2008-05-04 18:05:32 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-02 08:49:06 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 03:15:37 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 16:11:39 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 10:37:41 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2008-05-01 20:40:43 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 12:08:53 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 07:43:14 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 21:24:38 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2008-05-02 07:58:49 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 23:09:56 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-05-02 10:30:39 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-30 22:38:36 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 07:55:03 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 12:22:17 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-05-01 10:56:08 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 03:57:13 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-29 19:01:56 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-30 11:30:08 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Frederico Fonseca <rea  2008-04-30 19:01:36 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-30 21:42:03 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-01 10:55:04 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-30 19:43:00 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Charles Hottel"  2008-04-30 19:47:25 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-04-30 22:10:32 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-05-01 19:21:11 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 13:30:34 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-05-01 22:11:55 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-28 11:28:39 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-28 22:44:55 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
CG <Carl.Gehr.ButNoSPA  2008-04-29 10:53:39 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Crebassa.Gilles@[EM  2008-05-01 02:10:53 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 11:43:53 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 00:44:26 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 22:48:28 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-05-02 10:25:57 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 05:09:20 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Michael Wojcik <mwojci  2008-05-02 23:46:02 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 12:42:30 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-02 14:07:17 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-05-02 12:42:46 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-05-02 16:53:09 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-05-03 18:06:21 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-05-02 12:45:00 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 12:55:59 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 11:33:43 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 23:42:55 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 19:36:29 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 09:29:01 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-05 07:49:42 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"tlmfru" <la  2008-05-05 12:04:50 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-05 12:28:24 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-05 18:41:11 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-05 18:36:06 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Arnold Trembley <arnol  2008-05-06 05:21:36 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 13:16:39 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Thane <thaneh@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 13:18:50 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@[  2008-05-02 17:29:44 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 15:04:45 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 19:04:45 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-03 15:51:18 
Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 00:22:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 4 21:28:24 CDT 2008.