Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Saving CoBO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 8 Topic 4097 of 4195
Post > Topic >>

Re: Saving CoBOL

by "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 2, 2008 at 12:11 PM

"Howard Brazee" <howard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:copj14ltndjh64t1rupc8tv4q9bk4hqsbb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://blogs.computerworld.com/saving_cobol
>
I enjoyed the responses more than the article itself.

No matter how you cut it, there is a huge current investment in COBOL and
it 
seems irresponsible to simply throw it away.

I think refactoring may be an answer. It has certainly worked for my own 
stuff. I'm still running COBOL components as unmanaged code in .NET and
have 
had no need to replace them so far.

The lack of jobs is going to be the main nail in the coffin.

The old-timers are fading away and the new guys can do the same stuff 
smarter and quicker with modern approaches and languages.

That's still noreason to throw away stuff that isn't broken...

Pete.
-- 
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Saving CoBOL
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-01 09:52:37 
Re: Saving CoBOL
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 16:21:21 
Re: Saving CoBOL
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 12:11:24 
Re: Saving CoBOL
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-05-01 21:45:42 
Re: Saving CoBOL
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 09:34:45 
Re: Saving CoBOL
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 21:56:19 
Re: Saving CoBOL
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-02 15:02:20 
Re: Saving CoBOL
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-05-02 21:51:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 22:04:22 CDT 2008.