Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Cobol > Re: Interesting...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 52 of 74 Topic 4071 of 4195
Post > Topic >>

Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)

by "tlmfru" <lacey@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM

If I may stick my oar in here - Pete, make sure that when you use a term
with meaning in both OO and non-OO that your reader knows exactly what you
mean.

A discussion between us last year foundered when you used a word -
function - that meant in non-OO terms that the program /system did not
perform that particular necessary process, while in OO it means something
completely different.

Natural language is slippery.

PL
..
Richard Brady <rrllbrrady@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e1KLj.88781$D_3.36594@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pete Dashwood wrote:
> [snip]
> >   The im****tant (to me...), and usually overlooked by people obsessed
only
> > with coding, thing here is the CONCEPTUAL use you get from an Object.
This
> > is BECAUSE it is as you described above. Identifying Objects
conceptually
> > and building them in code go hand in hand in my book. I have never
> > considered Objects to be ONLY the "instantiation in memory of a
defined
> > computer Class", even though that is all they are to a program. PEOPLE
can
> > use Objects (conceptually) and can model with them, modify them,
(without
> > committing any computer code to memory), do walkthroughs with them,
and
> > conceptually juggle with them to get a better solution. That is just
as
> > im****tant in an Object Oriented approach to problem solution, as the
> > technical details which apply to computer code.
> >
> [snip]
> > Absolutely. The fact is that when you encapsulate behaviours and
properties
> > into an Object, the synergistic whole, is far greater than the sum of
its
> > parts. The code representation is only ONE aspect of it.
> >
> > Pete.
>
> OK Pete,
> At the risk of getting you in serious trouble again, here I have these
> files to read containing data.  How does this data constitute an object
> and after I've manipulated the heck out of it generating the view I
> wish, how do I save the object(s) to media (disk, print or screen)?
>
> Thanks for this and other insights.
>
> Regards,
> Richard Brady
 




 74 Posts in Topic:
Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 12:08:44 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-28 11:22:51 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 13:10:05 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-28 12:31:28 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 14:33:27 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 14:53:00 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-29 10:16:59 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 18:01:42 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-28 22:57:57 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-29 12:01:10 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-30 09:05:25 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-30 01:03:06 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-29 23:19:59 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-04-01 11:23:23 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-28 14:07:59 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-28 13:54:59 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Kellie Fitton <KELLIEF  2008-03-28 14:11:19 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 18:54:27 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-28 22:50:47 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 22:47:17 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Kellie Fitton <KELLIEF  2008-03-28 14:13:40 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-28 22:55:47 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-28 18:10:10 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Alistair <alistair@[EM  2008-03-28 18:12:53 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-29 01:15:20 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-30 08:59:23 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-28 13:41:46 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-29 10:42:50 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 19:20:59 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-28 23:01:10 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"tlmfru" <la  2008-03-31 12:20:41 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-01 12:44:13 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
docdwarf@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-01 00:01:46 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-02 10:50:55 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-04-01 16:24:52 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-02 13:40:05 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 19:51:12 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-03-29 00:11:50 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-29 09:24:32 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-29 10:09:10 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-28 20:12:49 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-03-30 09:22:58 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-03-29 18:21:54 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-01 12:57:36 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-03-28 22:47:37 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-29 06:18:19 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-29 06:27:30 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
tim <TimJ@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-29 20:47:39 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Joe Zitzelberger <zber  2008-04-11 00:15:30 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-11 16:39:41 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Richard Brady <rrllbrr  2008-04-11 13:51:06 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-11 12:54:50 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-12 12:50:19 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"tlmfru" <la  2008-04-12 19:20:03 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-13 21:07:14 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-12 12:36:35 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-11 14:29:11 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-12 18:55:25 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-12 13:47:33 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-12 14:42:48 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-13 20:33:47 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-13 22:39:57 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-14 15:34:49 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-13 23:47:34 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-04-14 14:24:00 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Pete Dashwood"  2008-04-15 13:14:01 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Joe Zitzelberger <zber  2008-04-17 00:45:33 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Joe Zitzelberger <zber  2008-04-17 00:37:38 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Charles Hottel"  2008-04-12 12:14:32 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-12 15:11:35 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-14 13:40:11 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Rick Smith" &l  2008-04-11 13:03:05 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
Richard Brady <rrllbrr  2008-04-13 19:04:10 
Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
"Frank Swarbrick&quo  2008-04-14 18:10:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 16:31:40 CDT 2008.